The program includes a slide-show function, with 150+ transitional effects, as well as lossless JPEG transitions, drop shadow effects, image annotation, scanner support, histogram, and other options. You will get access to thumbnail browser and major functionalities via hidden toolbars that pop up when your mouse touches one of the four edges of the screen as well. The full-screen mode of this app provides innovative and intuitive access to the full-screen mode and EXIF information. Among other functions available you will find resizing, cropping, retouching and color adjustments. Some editing options include red-eye removal. A great option for image viewing, editing, management, comparison, etc. You may also like: AlphaBlur Image Effects app review FastStoneĪnother image browser which allows you simply viewing images. There is a number of manipulations that you can do with the images as well, you will see them when you run the program. The program supports Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, and 10 and is available in multiple languages. Or maybe after the usage of an app, you will realize that’s all you need to view images on your Windows. At least by trying you won’t lose basically anything – the programs are only 3 MB and it is super fast to download, install and delete as well. ![]() So if you are far from being into all these designer and editing media staff you should probably try this one out. Some people want to keep it simple and use it only to see the image and have a possibility to share it on social media. And they don’t want these progs to occupy a lot of space in their memory as well. So I am putting in a plug for this product.This is a program for those who don’t want to deal with large and heavy multi-functional image readers only for viewing images. I am surprised Adobe has not already produced such a product for this purpose. I posted a suggestion on line for this, and have gotten some others seconding my proposal. They would just need to strip down the code they already have. I would think it would not be all that difficult of a task to produce the viewer. What Adobe should do is provide a freely distributed, stand-alone, Lr viewer, which would allow others to view all of such features created in Lr, much like Adobe did with the PDF reader for documents. Windows Explorer provides the ability to find subsets of images based on any of the metadata: tags, titles and descriptions, etc., put in with LR, but they will never be able to put faces with names. I can publish my hard work for my extended families, and they will be able to know what names are associated with an image, but they will not be able to see which person in the image belongs to which name. The only problem with this feature, is that the tagging can only be viewed within one of the Lr image editing applications. Lr, starting with version 6, includes the ability to tag faces, which I really wanted, and why I upgraded from Lr 5 to Lr6. However, what would be extremely useful would be an Adobe Lr Viewer, like the Adobe PDF reader, but for viewing images enhanced by Lr. As stated, it would not be useful to make either PS or Lr a default image viewer in Windows. The original poster missed the point a image viewer, to view images which have been enhanced by Lr. In most cases, you'll find that image programs are not as lightweight as the Windows photo viewer. You can try to Google "replacement for windows photo viewer" and you'll see a number of possible alternatives, and can compare the features. But I wouldn't want to make it the default app to open in image file. Lightroom can only open a Lightroom catalog directly, you can't open a JPG or other image file straight into LR without going through the import process.Īdobe Bridge, which comes with Photoshop, is a good file browser in and of itself, and it is a good replacement for Windows Explorer when you're browsing folders of images. Lightroom is not an option at all - you import your images with Lightroom's internal database, and manage the images there. Trying to use it as a viewer would be like driving a truck to get from one side of the room to the other. Photoshop is a very heavyweight editor, takes awhile to load, and is designed for editing, not fast viewing. ![]() No, I don't think you'd want to use either of these programs to be your default image viewer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |